faseeh ullah's Review

Great Service everything is Good in this Center Staff is good and every test held in this Center and Good thing is they provide Reports on Whatsapp

The receptionist did not listen to me properly, so i moved to another laboratory.

Totally Bad Experience, before 1 month my TGS was 400 after that I have set good diet plan and done 3 hours exercise on daily base, but when I have again get my report after 1 month from Makkah lab my TGS were 1242 which was very shocking for me but at the same time I get the report from Shaukat Khanam laboratory my TGS were 208, please don't relay on it. Don't recommend anyone, it's prices are low but reports are computer generated.

Today, I visited Makkah Lab on Nishtar Road, Multan, to submit my mother's samples. As a final-year resident nephrologist, I'm well aware of the minimum volume requirements for various urine tests, including CUE, microscopy, dipstick, and spot exams. I was taken aback when the lab technician insisted on a minimum volume of approximately 5cc for the spot test, despite my explanation that patients with certain kidney conditions, such as glomerulonephritis (GN) or chronic kidney disease (CKD), often produce minimal urine. In some cases, patients may be anuric, producing only a few drops of urine per day. It defies logic to expect such patients to produce a substantial amount of urine solely for laboratory testing. Throughout my residency, I've frequently encountered patients with limited residual kidney function, and we've consistently sent even small amounts of urine to the lab for workup. Unfortunately, the lab technician refused to accommodate our request today, despite my reasoning. I hope this concern can be addressed to ensure that patients with kidney disease receive the necessary diagnostic testing without undue burden. Today's experience at your lab was extremely disappointing. Despite providing 8.5cc of precious blood sample, carefully divided into three vials, the technician refused to perform the requested tests, including fasting iPTH and BNP levels. This decision was made solely because the sample size was deemed insufficient. As a healthcare provider, I'm accustomed to working with limited resources and compromised sample quality. In many cases, we must make do with less-than-ideal samples to ensure timely diagnosis and treatment. While it's true that larger sample sizes are preferable, it's unrealistic to expect optimal conditions in every scenario. In this instance, the patient's condition – CKD, anemia, and O-negative blood group – made every drop of blood precious. Denying testing altogether due to sample size constraints is unacceptable. As healthcare professionals, we must adapt to less-than-ideal circumstances and prioritize patient care. I urge you to reconsider your policies and accomodate testing with available samples, even if they don't meet ideal requirements.